主裁：夸安萨拉拽丘库埃梅卡没判罚？这是极轻微、无效的拉拽（主裁回应夸安萨拉拉拽丘库埃梅卡未判：接触极轻微，拉拽无实质影响）
Explaining holding penalties
In the penalty area, holding is penalized if it interferes with an opponent or has an impact. Terms like "trifling" might come into play, indicating minor contact that doesn’t affect the game. While pulling a shirt is considered holding, if it's minimal and doesn’t impact play, many referees may allow the game to continue. Video review can't overturn this either unless there’s a "clear and obvious error." Factors to consider include duration, intensity, distance to the ball, and any exaggeration involved. So, without specific match details, I'll provide a general explanation of these judgments.
简短答复：如果萨拉对丘库埃梅卡的拉拽确实“极轻微、未产生实际影响”，主裁不判罚是符合执裁原则的；VAR也不会因这种接触推翻场上决定。
参考要点（足规与判罚尺度）：
- 规则：拉拽属于“拉人/牵拉”（Holding）。只有当它实质性地影响对手的跑动、平衡、触球或机会时，才应判任意球/点球。
- 判罚因素：力度与持续时间；是否改变对手动作/路线；球是否在可争抢距离；拉拽是否带来不正当优势；是否有明显拉回（如球衣被明显拽伸）。
- VAR门槛：需“明显且重大的误判”。场上判不罚且接触轻微无效，通常不达干预标准。
因此，如果那一下没有减速、改线或阻止丘库埃梅卡触球/起脚，不判罚合理；若存在明显拉回、速度被破坏或球衣被拽变形，则应判点球。
需要更具体判断的话，发下视频或时间点，我帮你逐帧按上述标准评估。